PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PERKULIAHAN GEOGRAFI POLITIK DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION (IC) DI UNIVERSITAS PGRI PALEMBANG
Keywords:
Interpersonal Communication (IC), Political GeographyAbstract
The problem is "How to Improve the Quality of Political Geography Lectures with Interpersonal Communication Learning Model (IC) at PGRI University of Palembang?".This research used are qualitative data, in the form of primary data and secondary data. Primary data obtained directly from the observation. Secondary data obtained from the documentation of the test results and the final value of fifth semester in subjects Political Geography. As a lecturer of Political geography lecture for the fifth semester of the teaching scholar. This study uses an action research model of Kemmis and Taggart, which is spiral-shaped from one cycle to the next. According Kemmis and Taggart there are several stages namely: Planning (Plan), Action (act), Observation (Observe) and Reflection (reflect). The result of the observation from 34 students who studied Political Geography during the first cycle of score only 51% who dared to communicate, but in the second cycle showed an increase of 82% level of courage to communicate students. While based on the test the first cycle value of the test student value of 67 and in the second cycle has increased that is equal to 85. Based on data observation sheet, and the tests concluded that the learning model of Interpersonal Communication (IC) creativity and communicative activities of students semseter 5A in the course of Political Geography has increased. It is also seen from the Semester Results List of Participants and the Final Score (DPNA) Politics Geography course students, the average student good value that is equal to 83%.
References
Abdurrahman, Mulyono. 1999. Pendidikan bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Ahmad Asep hidayat. 2006. Filsafat bahasa mengungkapkan hakikat bahasa, makna, dan tanda.Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2002. Belajar Mengajar Efektif dan Efisien. Jakarta.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2002, Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Berbasis Sekolah Konsep Dasar, Jakarta : Ditjend Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Ditjen SLTP.
_______________________. 2001,Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai ustaka.
Dimyati, Mujiono. 1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
________________________. 2000. Dosen dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Reneka Cipta
Djamarah dan Aswani Zian. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Effendy, Onong.1994.Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek.Bandung:PT Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2001. Proses Pelajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Hasbullah. 1999. Dasar – dasar Ilmu Peandidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Indonesia.
Ibrahim, R. 1996. Perencanaan Pengajaran. Penerbit : Rineka Cipta.
Idris, Zahara dan Jamal Lisma , 1992. Pengantar Pendidikan I , Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Poerwadarminta. 1998. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Sagala, Syaiful. 2010. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran, Bandung: Alfabeta
Surakhmad, Winarno. 1990. Pengantar Pendidikan Ilmiah, Bandung: Tarsito.
Thalib Bachri Syamsul. 2010. Pisikologi Pendidikan Berbasis Analisis Empiris Aplikatif, Jakarta: Kencana Pradana Media Group.
Usman, Uzer. 2003. Mengukur Prestasi Panduan Menjadi Dosen Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Wassid, Iskandar.2011.Strategi pembelajaran bahasa.Bandung:PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Wiriatmadja, Rochiati. 2005. Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: Rosdakary.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








