PERBEDAAN INDEKS PRESTASI KUMULATIF (IPK) MAHASISWA ANTARA GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL, AUDITORIAL DAN KINESTETIK PADA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI FKIP UNIVERSITAS PGRI PALEMBANG

Authors

  • Zahruddin Hodsay Universitas PGRI Palembang

Keywords:

Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA), Learning Styles, Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic

Abstract

This research titled Differences between Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) and Learning Styles of Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic to the Accounting Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education PGRI University of Palembang. The problem in this research was “whether or not differences between Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) and Learning Styles of Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic to the Accounting Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education PGRI University of Palembang?”. The objective of this research was to find out whether or not Differences between Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) and Learning Styles of Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic to the  Accounting Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education PGRI University of Palembang. The method used comparative test over two averages and the approach used a quantitative approach. The data were collected by the documentation and questionnaires. The population of this research was 129 students were taken from the eighth level students PGRI University of Palembang academic year 2014/2015 and the sample of this research was 98 students. The data analysis used the comparative test over two averages.The result of this research was obtained a visual learning style 3.29, auditory learning style 3.23, and kinesthetic learning style 3.23. Hypothesis test used comparative over two averages Fcount 1.36 with standard error Ftable α 0.05 find out 3.10. so 1.36 < 3.10 then Ha was rejected and Ho was accepted so no differences between Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) and Learning Styles of Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic to the Accounting Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education PGRI University of Palembang.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Budiningsih. 2012. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Reneka Cipta.

Daryanto. 2007. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Reneka Cipta.

Depoter Bobbi, Reardo Mark & Singer Sarah.Quantum Teaching.Bandung : Kaifa

Dimyati dan Mudjino, 2013. Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

FKIP Universitas PGRI. 2015. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. Palembang FKIP

Hamalik Oemar. 2014. Kurikulum& Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi

Porter Bobbi De dan Mike Hernacki. 1992. Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaffa.

Purwanto, Ngalim,2007. Psikologi Pendidikan.Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Paramitasari, Dyah retno. 2011. Cara Instan Melatih Daya Ingat. Jakarta: Agogos Publising

Sugiyono. 2010. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujana 2005: Metoda Statistik . Bandung : Tarsito.

Supranto J. 2009: Statistik Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-05

How to Cite

Hodsay, Z. (2016). PERBEDAAN INDEKS PRESTASI KUMULATIF (IPK) MAHASISWA ANTARA GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL, AUDITORIAL DAN KINESTETIK PADA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI FKIP UNIVERSITAS PGRI PALEMBANG. Jurnal PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(1), 73–86. Retrieved from https://jp.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/JP/article/view/266

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.